This is confirmed by the fact that the GPT-3 paper mentions that it is trained on multiple datasets, including Common Crawl, which essentially means everything on the internet. The interesting relationship between ChatGPT and Stack Overflow is that the LLM-based chatbot is trained on the data available on Stack Overflow. It is too convenient for developers to post their questions on ChatGPT and get immediate responses instead of going to Stack Overflow and explaining every single step of the problem. ChatGPT now makes them believe that it’s original, even if it’s not.
#Stackoverflow down code
Even if that holds true, the report from SimilarWeb does bring up the question -Whether people are moving to ChatGPT over Stack Overflow or not? And Why might that be the case? ChatGPT is Too Convenientĭevelopers have been copying code from Stack Overflow all these years. When it comes to the drop in February, the team told AIM that it is because there are less number of days in the month, and the number actually increased if we count daily users. The Stack Overflow team had told AIM that the drop in the number of visits in December was only because of the holiday season and nothing else. After just a little rise in January to 249 million, the website visits dropped even lower in February, to 239 million. According to reports from SimilarWeb, after the release of ChatGPT in November, there was a 12% decrease in the number of website visits, from 279 million to 247 million in December. However, this ban on ChatGPT did not bode that well for Stack Overflow. In December last year, the forum decided to ban posting information generated by ChatGPT, citing high inaccuracy in the answers that the bot provides and how that can be “ substantially harmful to the sites and the users looking for correct answers”. It is a massive community for discussion and collaboration. This technique can also be particularly useful with higher-order components (also known as HOCs).Stack Overflow, the Q&A platform for developers has always been the go to place for all programmers. Forwarding refs in higher-order components
#Stackoverflow down upgrade
This is because your library likely has an observably different behavior (such as what refs get assigned to, and what types are exported), and this can break apps and other libraries that depend on the old behavior.Ĭonditionally applying React.forwardRef when it exists is also not recommended for the same reasons: it changes how your library behaves and can break your users’ apps when they upgrade React itself. When you start using forwardRef in a component library, you should treat it as a breaking change and release a new major version of your library. You can forward refs to class component instances, too. Ref forwarding is not limited to DOM components. Regular function or class components don’t receive the ref argument, and ref is not available in props either. The second ref argument only exists when you define a component with React.forwardRef call. When the ref is attached, ref.current will point to the DOM node.
We forward this ref argument down to by specifying it as a JSX attribute.function inside forwardRef as a second argument. React passes the ref to the (props, ref) =>.We pass our ref down to by specifying it as a JSX attribute.We create a React ref by calling React.createRef and assign it to a ref variable.Here is a step-by-step explanation of what happens in the above example: This way, components using FancyButton can get a ref to the underlying button DOM node and access it if necessary-just like if they used a DOM button directly. Function FancyButton ( props ) ) ) // You can now get a ref directly to the DOM button: const ref = React.
0 kommentar(er)
